| ??? 12/22/00 05:23 Read: times |
#7487 - RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 |
Yes I agree, some micros are are sensitive. Even if you ask ATMEL, they will ask you to send them the stamp infor at the bottom of the Chip.
Then they will say, our shrink die micros are prone to noise. God help you. No more help from Atmel. Simon |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: driving ULN2003 with 89C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 |



