??? 08/13/04 07:55 Read: times |
#75868 - RE: 8052 - Timer2 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"Every time you have that happening, your RTC is going to get a little more incorrect. You have to make your code adjusting for that."
If you take a look at the threads I cited above you'll see that this isn't the case. |
Topic | Author | Date |
8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052 - Timer2![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |