| ??? 09/02/04 18:54 Read: times |
#76833 - No, I am using SDCC Responding to: ???'s previous message |
and the loader on the 51 will have to adjust absolute addresses according to where it gets located. Scanning for SJMP, LJMP, JSR, etc., is the easy part, and modifying the address that comes after the instruction. But if there is a data section in the code, I don't want the loader to incorrectly assume that there are x51 instructions within the data, and start modifying them. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| \ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Multitasking" with no traps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Title | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multitasking with no traps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multitasking with no traps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multitasking with no traps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: soft interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: \ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE:I would like to know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| true, but there are times when | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: true, but there are times when | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, I am using SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never seen such times. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Never seen such times. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OS Advocate | 01/01/70 00:00 |