??? 09/21/04 15:21 Read: times |
#77848 - RE: About CRC-16 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
It is that manner of incorporating the data as part of the CRC calculation that is missing in both your bit-oriented and table-oriented implementations. And that is the problem I was addressing some time ago here: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=68291 |
Topic | Author | Date |
About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What CRC-16? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What CRC-16? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What CRC-16? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What CRC-16? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It works for me! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Initial values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Initial values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Read the article | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Karma | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: About CRC-16![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |