| ??? 10/09/04 09:55 Read: times |
#79070 - RE: Which 8052? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael Neary said:
Your previous posts (none) don't suggest what your 8052 will be doing. This may make a difference if you want a 'better' program for your 8052 project. Yes - that was my question here. As far as the terminal emulator's concerned, it makes no difference at all which particular 8052 variant is being used; all the terminal emulator "knows" is that it sends stuff to a COM: port and receives stuff from a COM: port - what is connected to that COM: port is entirely irrelevant. (in fact the terminal emulator doesn't even "know" if it's talking to a real RS232 connection, or something just pretending to be a COM: port - like a PCI modem, or some USB thingy that presents a virtual COM: port interface on the PC...) But, as you say, "what your 8052 will be doing" may well have a bearing on the requirements of the terminal emulator. We still await clarification on this! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| procomm plus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: procomm plus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Current Product? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: procomm plus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: procomm plus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: procomm plus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you tried my links? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: procomm plus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your requirement? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Your requirement? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Your requirement? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: DIY | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Microsoft 3.11 TERMINAL.EXE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which 8052? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Which 8052? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: procomm plus | 01/01/70 00:00 |