??? 11/03/04 17:15 Read: times |
#80320 - RE: Commenting Responding to: ???'s previous message |
commented thoroughly the most obvious sections of the code, while those obscure 3 lines that make the key of the program are left uncommented
That is true, but a more often seen problem is worthless comments. As an example of worthless commenting: hello: push acc; save accumulator mov a, step; move step to a cjne step,#4,hello1; branch if step is not 4 mov a,#18; move 18 to acc mov step,a 18; step to acc value hello1: pop acc; restore accumulator ret; return from subroutine The above would be so much better served with one line of comment above the routine ; if step = 4, set it to 18, otherwise leave untouched. or - even better : if step = NEW_MAIL, set step = CHECK_MAIL Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Elevators logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic - Bartosz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
VINDICATION! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Repeated pushes...Joseph | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Repeated pushes...Joseph | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Repeated pushes...Joseph | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Repeated pushes...Joseph | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Elevators and women | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators and women | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Up or Down - thats the question! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Up or Down - thats the question! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Commenting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Commenting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Commenting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good advice - Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Commenting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Commenting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Commenting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Elevators logic![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |