??? 11/05/04 22:24 Read: times |
#80523 - RE: P3_2 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Charles Bannister said:
I am sure the problem (you encountered - sp_3 not being defined) exists also in Keil and Raisonance also. I was about to say that I doubt P3_2 would be defined by Keil - but it is! You can see for yourself: http://www.keil.com/dd/docs/c51/atmel/reg8252.h So there you go - that's thwarted my chance to agree with your criticism of Keil! |