| ??? 11/10/04 15:34 Read: times |
#80941 - RE: So where does Keil come into it? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hernan Sanchez said:
With this sintax it complains with:
Actual argument type different from declaration 2 from type 'long-int generic* function (char, unsigned-char,unsigned-unknown type, unsigned-int, insigned-int, unsigned-int)' to type 'long-int function (char, unsigned-char, unsigned-long-int, unsigned-int, insigned-int, unsigned-int) code*' I think it's complaining that you're giving it a function when it expects a pointer to a function? or vice-versa? But anyhow, passing function pointers is a really bad idea for an 8051!! Has this stack really been designed for an 8051? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| GMI free Ip stack port from keil 2 SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: GMI free Ip stack port from keil 2 SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternatively | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just a minute... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: GMI free Ip stack port from keil 2 SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ported - not designed :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: So where does Keil come into it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| All OK now, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off to Hitech C forums.......Next step. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You gets wot you pays for...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gembin Ip stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dead thread? | 01/01/70 00:00 |