| ??? 11/10/04 16:06 Read: times |
#80949 - Only non-obvious? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jez is getting patents on his stuff - if it were obvious, he wouldn't be able to do that...! You obviously have more faith than I do in the patent office. :) Regards, Craig Steiner PS--Not to disparage Jez's work. Just that the patent office has not been to vigilant in rejecting "obvious" patents lately. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only non-obvious? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Only non-obvious? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 |