| ??? 11/10/04 16:09 Read: times |
#80951 - RE: Only non-obvious? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Craig Steiner wrote:
------------------------------- You obviously have more faith than I do in the patent office. :) Not THE Patent Office, or the USPTO as you would see it, the European or UK Patent Office - they are much more stringent about prior art. Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only non-obvious? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Only non-obvious? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Speech recognition | 01/01/70 00:00 |



