| ??? 12/14/04 08:54 Read: times |
#83042 - RE Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If assembler works but C not, then you made a fault on translating from asembler to C.
I guess, your C skills need to be improved a little. If I guess C code works not as expected, I test it on the PC e.g. with an old Borland C DOS version (no big Windows stuff needed). But without code nobody can help further. "gimmee code" requests are ignored in the best case on this forum. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Help LCD--89C51 using KEIL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil App Notes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembler programmer learning C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So what happened to the USB, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The wanted code... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tips and Tricks.....Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not so volatile ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| optimiser | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Volatile warning? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another comment - symbolic names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| c code for lcd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| symbolic Port names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There's Gratitude for you! :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A better method in C | 01/01/70 00:00 |