| ??? 12/16/04 01:38 Read: times |
#83206 - Not so volatile ? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Andy,
It is the optimiser's job to remove useless code that simply wastes time and/or code space. No questions there. And Keil does warn about unused functions in the code. These variables are never used within the loops, and never used again outside the loop - an optimising compiler is entitled to spot this and remove the apparently "useless" code. But cntr_1 and cntr_2 variables are very much part of my Delay routine and how do you say they are never used ? In fact even in my earlier post this is what I said went over my head!! Raghu |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Help LCD--89C51 using KEIL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil App Notes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembler programmer learning C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So what happened to the USB, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The wanted code... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tips and Tricks.....Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not so volatile ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| optimiser | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Volatile warning? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another comment - symbolic names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| c code for lcd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| symbolic Port names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There's Gratitude for you! :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A better method in C | 01/01/70 00:00 |