| ??? 01/22/01 13:41 Read: times |
#8455 - RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM |
Jay,
I think a 12-bit converter IN a micro is questionable, as achieving that resolution along with sufficient accuracy with the digital noise may be difficult, if not impossible. Do you think that the scenario I mentioned with the micro sleeping while converting would make an internal 12-bit converter viable. I am not planning on using one of these 12-bit micros, so don't think that I am soliciting professional advice, I am just curious what you think. You made your previous message sound slightly like the failure of your competitors product was the fault of the PIC. I personaly don't use internal ADCs for instrumentation purposes. I think that their decision to use the internal low resolution converter rather than an external high resolution converter was the problem. Cory Spackman |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too expensive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 |



