Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/22/01 13:41
Read: times


 
#8455 - RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM
Jay,

I think a 12-bit converter IN a micro is questionable, as achieving that resolution along with sufficient accuracy with the digital noise may be difficult, if not impossible. Do you think that the scenario I mentioned with the micro sleeping while converting would make an internal 12-bit converter viable.

I am not planning on using one of these 12-bit micros, so don't think that I am soliciting professional advice, I am just curious what you think.

You made your previous message sound slightly like the failure of your competitors product was the fault of the PIC. I personaly don't use internal ADCs for instrumentation purposes. I think that their decision to use the internal low resolution converter rather than an external high resolution converter was the problem.

Cory Spackman

List of 12 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
Too expensive            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 80c51 + WD + EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List