??? 01/11/05 14:05 Read: times |
#84751 - Still a problem, then... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Rob Woodhouse said:
i rearranged the order in which i printed and it worked ??
strange! That almost certainly means that you are still using the wrong printf format specifiers - your code is probably working by luck rather than design! This will certainly come back to bite you if you don't really get it nailed now! please post the smallest complete example that exhibits the problem (and the re-ordered version that "works"); See here for how to post code. http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=84750 |
Topic | Author | Date |
Multiplication Problems and data types | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use unsigned int for totcount | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong printf format specifier? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes i am using printf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
manual! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using %d and %x | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
%u | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Exactly what it says on the tin! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Division problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
division problem in keil evaluation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Which Part? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
its ok i have sorted it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still a problem, then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not so strange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not so strange? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Need complete code! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Calling printf from an ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
other interrupts wont get in the way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes i see what you mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No No Inside ISR![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |