??? 01/11/05 14:18 Read: times |
#84755 - Not so strange? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Rob Woodhouse said:
i rearranged the order in which i printed and it worked ??
strange! I said:
That almost certainly means that you are still using the wrong printf format specifiers - your code is probably working by luck rather than design! Erik Malund said:
Not so strange ... I will bet you 3 to 1 that in the "rearranging" you corrected an error. Yes, that could well be it! |
Topic | Author | Date |
Multiplication Problems and data types | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use unsigned int for totcount | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong printf format specifier? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes i am using printf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
manual! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using %d and %x | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
%u | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Exactly what it says on the tin! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Division problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
division problem in keil evaluation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Which Part? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
its ok i have sorted it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still a problem, then... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not so strange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not so strange? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Need complete code! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Calling printf from an ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
other interrupts wont get in the way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes i see what you mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No No Inside ISR![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |