| ??? 01/19/05 08:48 Read: times |
#85276 - Existing thread Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Damjan Lapuh said:
in my 89S53 project I use 4 DS18B20 1-wire sensors. Because I don't want to mess with addressing them, I put them on separate io pins. I have 4 times same routines: reset1, reset2, reset3, reset4, read1...4, write1...4.
It works ok, but recently I added some new functions to my project and I got to 12225 bytes, which leaves me only 3 bytes... Note that this is exactly the approach that has been suggested in the other thread! http://www.8052.com/forum/thr...read=85083 In my case, each set of functions takes under 150 bytes - which is peanuts relative to the overall size of your project! I think you need to look elsewhere to make any significant code savings! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Saving Code memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same topic discussed in different thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Existing thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why so fearful ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not multidrop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Customer replacement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| USE ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMMING TECHNIQUE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Looking in the wrong place! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not spend another $ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use a mask ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 |