??? 04/26/05 00:08 Read: times |
#92345 - No good! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kiran Kannur said:
The testing was rather simple. That's no good! As Michael pointed out, this is not a trivial feature! If you can't devise a full set of tests, you'd be better to abandon the idea altogether. There are so many nasty little gotchas! wrinkles and traps even before you get into dynamic resizing. At the boundary conditions i.e (sic) for 0 sized packets ... Zero-size packet is only one boundary condition - you need to considers the others, too! the microcontroller sends signal to the PC stating the retransmission of the whole data sequence from the beginning. I though that's what you were trying to avoid?! |
Topic | Author | Date |
PC to 8051f020 Communication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Protocols | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Packet Protocol.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
way to complex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Project | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Review | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Search Keywords | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RFC935 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Got it right!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
dynamic resizing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: dynamic resizing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My Opinion, whether you want it or not.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Careless talk | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: dynamic resizing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No good! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
testing![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: My Opinion, whether .... | 01/01/70 00:00 |