??? 05/02/05 00:56 Read: times |
#92691 - Timer2 @ 24MHz Responding to: ???'s previous message |
0. If you are not forced to, don't use the fastest baud rate I can use... use a slower baud rate instead.
1. If all you need in order to use 11.05 is rewritimg the program with new timing values, i mean if you can obtain the very same timing criteria with a 11.05 by rewriting the program, then move your accumulator and do it. 2. If you are forced to use 19200 and can't rewrite the program for a 11.05: A slight percent of error in the baud rate is thought to be tolerable. You may use a 24MHz instead of 12MHz and Timer2 instead of Timer1, then with some modifications in the timings, The 24MHz xtall yields to slighter(.16%) baud rate errors. http://www.keil.com/c51/baudrate.asp |
Topic | Author | Date |
About Baud Rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do this yourself... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Baud rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Timer2 @ 24MHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Agree![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |