| ??? 06/21/05 09:42 Read: times |
#95442 - UART ISP vs. SPI ISP Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Anil Gupta said: I wouldn't suggest it if it would not.
I wonder whether hyper-term will be able to ISP RD2 or ED2 ?? Anil Gupta said: That's a substantial difference. ED2/RD2 (and others) use UART for ISP, while AT89S8252 (and AT89S5x) use SPI-like interface for ISP. I doubt the latter can be programmed in a simple way using Hyperterminal.
I have not used ED2 or RD2 but used ISP 89s8252. Anil Gupta said: You are wrong. Both DOS (32-bit extensions) and Win command line tools can and do use dll's.
DOS/ command line tool doesn't use DLL. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| FLIP, ISP programming for 89C51ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use a terminal program | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FLIP, ISP programming for 89C51ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flip 2. Has Dos Window Command Version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-hyper-terminal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| YES!! 'batchisp' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| command line vs. windowed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hyper Term for ISP ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART ISP vs. SPI ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: YES!! 'batchisp' | 01/01/70 00:00 |