| ??? 06/27/05 17:41 Read: times |
#96036 - Call Table? (again) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yeah, right sorry... I didn't realize we were so concerned about the stack space. I'm sure most of the compilers would support inline assembly in order to pop 2 bytes off of the stack. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Coding a Jmp table in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jmp Tables in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you do not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Call table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Of course not! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use jmp@a+dptr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| jmp table not in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong ends of sticks? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You do not control the Compiler Output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You can not have your cake and eat it to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jump Table in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Call Table? (again) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Call Table? (again) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I never did use function pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No pain, no gain. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the overlaying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There can be a gain. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My 2 cents worth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incorrect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As Matter of Fact.... | 01/01/70 00:00 |