| ??? 07/05/05 21:01 Read: times |
#96645 - unwritten rules in '51 design |
Today, in a different thread (and I recall this was not for the first time) Erik Malund expressed a dislike for a certain SiLabs range of '51 clones, because they broke a certain unwritten rule, according to which the clones keep the position, the names and the meanings of the original 8051/8052 SFRs (and maybe more). It seems to me, that this "rule" is one of sources of the '51-planet popularity, probably due to the enhanced feeling of compatibility, i.e. that if needed, one can easily switch to a different derivative. Are there any other derivatives "violating" this "rule"? Any other comments? Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| unwritten rules in '51 design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if we discuss the rules, will they still | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do you mean "unwritten?" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how far is it different | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes and no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Then they are not there. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, Joseph | 01/01/70 00:00 |