??? 08/05/05 14:16 Read: times Msg Score: +2 +2 Good Answer/Helpful |
#98866 - OT - you are fully right erik Responding to: ???'s previous message |
but I also like this method as the best method i see in term of cost effectiveness....
It costs only a few hundred cycles a few cheap components It is also of course very inacurate, and needs some tuning tuning.... but it is definitly nice. simple little hacks are often more reliable than complex systems, and I think you know this better than most of us Don't be this hard with the previous post, I believe it was just given as example. Best regards Benjamin |