??? 08/23/05 17:29 Read: times |
#99924 - you will have to anyhow Responding to: ???'s previous message |
However, I'd rather try a software UART if possible, so I don't have to add more hardware
you will have to anyhow, you will need a MAX232(equivalent). so, since you will have to, why not go the "safe" route Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Bit-banging/software UART on a AT89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this will be a mess when you do not have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: this will be a mess when you do not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
now it is 3 devices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: now it is 3 devices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SW UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: SW UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use a second 89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you will have to anyhow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The max has 2+2 drivers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some other things to think about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TL16C754 software flow control question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what does that have to do with bit-bangi![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nope, there are many external UARTs ava | 01/01/70 00:00 |