| ??? 11/20/07 14:10 Read: times |
#147250 - QED? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
People who learn assembler first tend to then write their 'C' programs as if they were assembler Stefan Kanev said:
as You stated ASM-thinking is different, so i found unexpected limit in compiler QED! ;-) Actually, this is not a limit in the compiler - it is perfectly valid behaviour. Some would say that it's even preferable to the GCC behaviour. in my situation, is not very interesting to read 789 pages manual A compiler manual is not a good way to learn the language; A compiler manual assumes that you know the language, and focusses only on its implementation-specific issues. Unfortunately, there is no short-cut to learning 'C', and diving straight in to convert some existing assembler is probably not a terribly effective approach - as you are finding? maybe will drop IAR limitations Again, it's not a limitation of IAR! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Sequence of learning 8051, asm and C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2 Issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT - error message | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use the tags | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| single-character const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| QED? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As Erik suggests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just learning - too luxury. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how can that be "too luxorious" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Foolish builder? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pointer to a const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| True, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Explaining | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| helpfull ,thanks, but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Adjust declaration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| const | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no wrong path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Freebies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erik is right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You\'re skipping the most important step ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |