| ??? 07/12/08 14:24 Modified: 07/12/08 14:27 Read: times |
#156645 - They surely do look like that, don\'t they? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
They look the same, aside from the '+' sign. A diac wouldn't need the polarity indication ...
http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=156626 shows an application where a diac might fit, though. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Schematic symbol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jon where was this connected? that you show here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Electrolytic is my vote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Looks like a thing... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK, but I'm sure it's an electrolytic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bootstrap capacitor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So why the shading? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are absolutely right... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I believe it's a cap... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't it supposed to denote... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your symbol is rather small ... but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No - it's definitely some sort of capacitor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They surely do look like that, don\'t they? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don\'t think so. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're right ... I don't see what you see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hey Jon, look at this .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still doesn't answer... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's japanese | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Standards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look at the parts list? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Draugting standards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I stand corrected | 01/01/70 00:00 |