| ??? 08/01/09 04:37 Read: times |
#168075 - It should be designed for what they use Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I don't know that it is an appropriate design for an industry-standard antenna. It is probably correct for the on-board antenna, though. Whether that's a "correct antenna" I can't say. They are different, though.
I'm not sure of what they "should" be. I have always understood that a designer can do what he sees fit, and adhering to standards is not required for an entirely self-contained unit. That's why I raised the issue of matching impedance to an external antenna. Do we know that the on-board driver can drive an external antenna? I'd guess we don't. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Extending range of WiFi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try cisco | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Turn it round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its my notebook PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| all ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you tried this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IIRC ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| iirc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 3 ways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ANtenna | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you believe the router has the "muscle" ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ask yourself this ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Normally a reference design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It should be designed for what they use | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is my problem.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| at sourceforge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| some D-Link hardware is fussy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreed.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the D-link with RTL chip set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| :lol: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wrong way | 01/01/70 00:00 |