| ??? 10/03/09 11:28 Read: times |
#169377 - Oddly Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Steve M. Taylor said:
making a seismograph doesn't work well with "accelerometers" Just out of interest, why is that? VERY low accelerations. Seismic signals are buried in noise. Is there much seismic activity in Manchester? A heck of a lot. There are some quite active fault systems here. Nothing major Richter scale (2-3) http://www.esci.keele.ac.uk/geophysic...uakes.html for example. http://www.quakes.bgs.ac.uk/earthquak...quence.htm Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Earthquake sensors with X-Y accelerator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry - was there a question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seismograph | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why is that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oddly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Phew! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Noooo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with accellerometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| With Accellerometer below 100US | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cheap - but useless? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thinking of it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on second thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did I said networked accellerometer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sensing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| laptop/notebook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fundamental flaw? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SEEK and ye shall find | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| have seen before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what's the point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Read ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |