| ??? 10/07/09 11:44 Read: times |
#169490 - Did I said networked accellerometer? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Steve M. Taylor said:
Why did it use the AD chip ? Like I said, not well suited to long period seismic detection. Jecksons Ben said:
With accellerometer the system will be below 100US$ in total. There is no advantage in it being "cheap" if it can't actually do the job required of it! Long period seismic detectoion..........with networked sensors. Thank's Jeckson Ben |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Earthquake sensors with X-Y accelerator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry - was there a question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seismograph | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why is that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oddly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Phew! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Noooo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with accellerometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| With Accellerometer below 100US | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cheap - but useless? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thinking of it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on second thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did I said networked accellerometer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sensing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| laptop/notebook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fundamental flaw? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SEEK and ye shall find | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| have seen before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what's the point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Read ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |