| ??? 06/04/13 07:55 Read: times |
#189855 - Actually no Responding to: ???'s previous message |
They don't seem to leave out any key bits for implementing their soft core in their FPGA. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| OCD for FPGA core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Serial-to-EC2 reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C2spec.pdf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reality Check...... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| multi-threaded | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FPGA and soft cores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes ... but which debugger? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actually no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who's "they" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I wouldn't use FPGA unless I need more than just the core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FPGA on-chip debugging redundant? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| debugging embedded processors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's good to know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nice idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Von Neumann first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if that were the case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Poorly chosen acronym... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On Chip Debug is common | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On Chip Debug *is* a very good idea indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC | 01/01/70 00:00 |