| ??? 09/15/05 15:32 Read: times |
#101136 - I see the basic difference between a "tr Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'd say the difference between a parallel programmer and an ISP "programmer" is a difference in its implementation, not its purpose
I see the basic difference between a "traditional programmer" and an "ISP programmer" in the fact that a "traditional programmer" need to keep a lot of voltages and pulse widths very precice whereas an "ISP interface" (that is a good name, just thought of it) can send pulses at whatever timing. Thus an "ISP interface" need not be very precisely controlled and as long as the correct interface chip and software is used, it is virtually guaranteed to work. So making an "ISP interface" can easily be accoplished on the kitchen table. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Atmel's bad informing (again) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Informative Post. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Errata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Latest news on bugs in 8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks & Congrat's making Programmer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89S8252 programmer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89S8252 programmer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Datasheets | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm puzzled | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP programmer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I thought ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Of course, but is this a "programmer" ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I see the basic difference between a "tr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Differences between ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timing critical SPI, well I'll be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New user needs help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what program, it'can't be the ISP interf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| please clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP!? | 01/01/70 00:00 |