??? 09/22/05 12:26 Read: times |
#101371 - No, it's using the eval Responding to: ???'s previous message |
No, it's using the eval.
With the attitude of many today "I want the best software money can buy, but I do not want to pay for it" Keil had to come up with a scheme to make the free eval version incapable of being used as a free tool for programming limited meomory size derivatives. One method was to make the eval incapable of locating C code below 400h. To make the eval usable they made the eval linker include a small code that at the interrupt location stored jumps to the location+400h so in 00bh they store a ljmp 040bh. So, the hardware is the same, just "invisible to the user" the interrupt locations has changed. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Locations of timer ISRs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Once again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Redirected interrupts? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
redirection in HW? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
HW redirection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No, it's using the eval | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thank you all![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |