??? 10/14/05 20:07 Modified: 10/14/05 20:11 Read: times |
#102435 - so what, the technique is the same Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hes addressing 2Mb. Thats not even close to what I consider obscene.
so what, the technique is the same. I am NOT using "banking" in the Keil sense and with the number of ports on a f120, I could address a terrabyte. By the way, do not be confoosed, for bragging the memory manufacturers list their memories in bits, I am; however talking about mega bytes and if you exand my routine with most significant on 2 ports instead of 1 you wabe 32 bit addressing (how much memory that is I'll leave to you to figure out) Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Addressing obscenely large amts of RAM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I use 2 Mbyte and read it as follows | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
serial | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oh i forgot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how do you determine that since it is pa | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Banking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2mb | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so what, the technique is the same | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wanton! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
EMS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
6 ports device | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why only 6![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |