| ??? 04/28/06 18:37 Read: times |
#115199 - Quite so Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
Setting volatile will not make it any less redundant. It can have nothing to do with his hardware (where volatile is usually applied) since the variablles are specified to be located anywhere by the compiler/linker. It is just possible that he is controlling the location of these variables by some Linker control(s) that he hasn't mentioned... Hence my reference to "...something more that you're not telling...?" http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=115185 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| MT8980 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You forget so quickly?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not Forget | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What, then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MT8980 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| shure, post it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and maybe some hardware explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MT8980 and 8051 code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do pay attention! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re type as your requirement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any decent compiler will ptimize the ict | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Explain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are way out in left field | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how can I help you cook a fish when you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ptimize | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| setting volatile will not make it any le | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Quite so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not typed as per requirement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a suggestion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 |