??? 05/17/06 10:06 Read: times |
#116362 - do you want a REAL challenge? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I have seen a bunch of '51 monitors (although certainly not all), and they roughly fall into 2 cathegories:
1. "self-contained", often with fancy features, e.g. integrated peephole assembler; 2. "core-only", where the fancy features and rather complicated GUI is accomplished on PC. Your monitor is clearly cathegory 1. Minus is its size. Plus is that "no PC needed", just a terminal emulator. Minus is it's limited user interface. Now you can improve on the last problem. Most terminal emulators emulate a "smart" terminal, usually VT-52 or a superset. This enables fancy features and a more intuitive user interface. I have not seen cat.1 monitor with such, all of them require to memorize "button presses", no fancy windowed outputs with simultaneously displayed memory+SFR+disassembled code as common in (DOS/console-based) emulators, for example; with a helpline on the bottom perhaps. Would this be a too big challenge for your project? Jan Waclawek PS. Think also on alternative "debugging channel" to free up the default serial channel. |
Topic | Author | Date |
amon52 (work in progress) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
v0.4 released | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
implementing breakpoints | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
breakpoints in monitors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
breakpoints | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good idea with the EI0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no and yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why not for rapid prototyping? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how would you prototype something that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the smarter monitors work like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not quite as smart | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SBC monitor?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do you want a REAL challenge? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's enough of a challenge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
monitors ... have a look here ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cheers | 01/01/70 00:00 |