??? 07/27/06 19:49 Modified: 07/27/06 19:57 Read: times |
#121212 - Doesn\'t have to look strange Responding to: ???'s previous message |
J.,
The dummy struct and macro are only required to preserve naming. typedef struct h { struct sd { U8 SDser[8] ; // serial number U8 SDaddr ; // address assigned to sign U8 SDdips ; // dipswitch setting U8 SDtype ; // type of sign U8 SDwidt ; // width U8 SDhgth ; // height } sd; U8 SDfill[256-sizeof(struct sd)-1] ; // fill struct to be 256 long // put this one last U8 SDerno ; // here store error number if FRAM match/update failed. } SIGN_DESC; |
Topic | Author | Date |
fixed size struct? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not quite clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thx, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Confused! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the original question is \"can you define a struct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Possible in theory, but the code looks strange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
figured the dummy out myself but that is the road | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Doesn\'t have to look strange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
got it, thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Aside - structure addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
which is the case in one of the instances | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nameless struct member![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
union of structs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
same as Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pascal | 01/01/70 00:00 |