| ??? 07/27/06 21:20 Read: times |
#121223 - Aside - structure addressing Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
but it will still be x.y.z instead of x.y Just as an aside, note that x.y.z has no run-time penalty over x.y; in fact, x.y has no runtime penalty over w ! This is because the compiler can do all the necessary offset calculations at compile time. Of course, x->y->z is an entirely different matter...! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| fixed size struct? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not quite clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thx, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Confused! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the original question is \"can you define a struct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Possible in theory, but the code looks strange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| figured the dummy out myself but that is the road | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Doesn\'t have to look strange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| got it, thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Aside - structure addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which is the case in one of the instances | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nameless struct member | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| union of structs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same as Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pascal | 01/01/70 00:00 |