??? 07/27/06 20:28 Read: times |
#121216 - got it, thanks Responding to: ???'s previous message |
but it will still be x.y.z instead of x.y
I'll ponder that :) Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
fixed size struct? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not quite clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thx, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Confused! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the original question is \"can you define a struct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Possible in theory, but the code looks strange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
figured the dummy out myself but that is the road | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Doesn\'t have to look strange | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
got it, thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Aside - structure addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
which is the case in one of the instances | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nameless struct member![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
union of structs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
same as Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pascal | 01/01/70 00:00 |