Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/16/06 04:15
Read: times


 
#122325 - There's not always a performance penalty
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Sometimes, with infrequently occurring interrupts, the result is actually better performance, because the associated status bit doesn't have to be examined as part of some other event process.

Some years back, I had a project in which there was a display to scan and a very long timer, actually a counter, that interrupted the CPU at a very small number of Hz. Doing the monitoring "manually," i.e. as part of the display scanning, one segment at a time, routine would have been awkward and somewhat inconvenient due to the low system clock frequency. The code for the entire system was smaller than 512 bytes and took less than two hours to generate and debug.

RE




List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Interupt question......            01/01/70 00:00      
   quick answer..            01/01/70 00:00      
   Noise            01/01/70 00:00      
   Perplexed......            01/01/70 00:00      
   Interrupt            01/01/70 00:00      
      does not matter            01/01/70 00:00      
         Attack            01/01/70 00:00      
            You did ask for it            01/01/70 00:00      
         Interruptifobia            01/01/70 00:00      
            There's not always a performance penalty            01/01/70 00:00      
               there is always an exception            01/01/70 00:00      
                  the controller task            01/01/70 00:00      
   very busy processor......            01/01/70 00:00      
      most likely it is not            01/01/70 00:00      
         PLC ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            since forever            01/01/70 00:00      
   Definatly a PLC....            01/01/70 00:00      
      a link            01/01/70 00:00      
      The application may be a PLC, but the chip is not            01/01/70 00:00      
         I do not think that is what David does            01/01/70 00:00      
   code......            01/01/70 00:00      
   Sorry......            01/01/70 00:00      
      Just post            01/01/70 00:00      
         code post.....            01/01/70 00:00      
            Posting Code and Idea            01/01/70 00:00      
            Where are ....            01/01/70 00:00      
   Ok back on this interupt routine            01/01/70 00:00      
      put an inverter on the pin            01/01/70 00:00      
   ZERO CROSS DETECTOR....            01/01/70 00:00      
      Saif, please and a note            01/01/70 00:00      
         actually...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List