??? 09/05/06 18:13 Read: times |
#123708 - Choose the best tool for the job. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
when you move to C you move to a 'universal language'. Anything universal will have limits compared to the specific. Very true. Also, the 'C' programming language has no support for handling individual bits. There is, however, no problem in having parts of a project in 'C' and other parts in assembler - you just need to learn which things are best done in 'C', and which in assembler. The Keil C51 manual tells you all about how to interface 'C' and assembler. |
Topic | Author | Date |
RL & RLC inst in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, they are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, they are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mistype | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Choose the best tool for the job. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another option (without if) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
May Be This Way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No, that won't work! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ways to skin the cat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler dependant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
compiler independent, but still very ugly version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank You | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A very important point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is nice C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem solved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil-specific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |