| ??? 09/06/06 08:33 Read: times |
#123732 - A very important point! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
Of course, you don't need the rotation for the bitshift (I2C) routine, you need shift Especially when going from Assembler to 'C', you need to think about what the code is required to do, rather than trying to implement the individual assembly instructions in 'C'!! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| RL & RLC inst in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, they are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, they are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mistype | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Choose the best tool for the job. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another option (without if) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May Be This Way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, that won't work! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ways to skin the cat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler dependant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| compiler independent, but still very ugly version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank You | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A very important point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is nice C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem solved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil-specific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 |