??? 09/07/06 08:51 Read: times |
#123807 - Need a better protocol! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kelvin Yan said:
I have discovered that the IAP actually crash the system, when the serial interrupt occured, during the IAP write operation. Allowing interrupts while actually updating the flash sounds like a really bad idea in any case! I can't predict the time to receive serial data True, but you can disable the interrupt. This may cause you to miss data - so you need to ensure that your protocol can detect this, and retransmit. Alternatively, redesign the protocol so that you can predict when serial data will arrive! |
Topic | Author | Date |
IAP and serial port receiving problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Who knows! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IAP and serial port receiving problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Need a better protocol! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if it's e.g. a datalogger, he can't change it... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jan, do you really want | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there is no mystery, just information or lack of | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DIsable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Partial solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If i | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
problems with interrupts in IAP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if and if not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Did not someone tell, ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as in life, only if you follow the rules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh yes it does! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What I meant... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it does, when he does not interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
serial IAP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If data is coming from PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I doubt the OP would ask if he could | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how does address vector can be copied into Block1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
block1![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |