| ??? 09/28/06 12:29 Read: times |
#125277 - WHY? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Its easy to implement the i2c bus in software
I'd guess that 50% of the modern derivatives have HW IIC, why not use one of those? Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 microcontroller with ISO7816 & I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its simple.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| implementing I2C in software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Emulating ISO7816 vs I2C in software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emulate ISO7816 in software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe not a good idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 7816 via UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WHY? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I use bit-bang instead of hardware i2c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as often as with an UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for those wondering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel and 7816 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrested | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| software I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why oh why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| welcome | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I did: Get a chip with HW IIC. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | ||
WHY ON EARTH DO SO? | 01/01/70 00:00 |