??? 10/02/06 12:57 Read: times |
#125591 - as often as with an UART Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The other thing that I think is goofy with a lot of i2c hardware is that you need to be interrupted way too often.
the IIC I work with interrupt once per byte, I see no way to do less without a DMA (which I have not seen in a '51 ). Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 microcontroller with ISO7816 & I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its simple.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
implementing I2C in software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Emulating ISO7816 vs I2C in software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
emulate ISO7816 in software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe not a good idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
7816 via UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WHY? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I use bit-bang instead of hardware i2c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as often as with an UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for those wondering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Atmel and 7816 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interrested | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
software I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why oh why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
welcome | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I did: Get a chip with HW IIC. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
01/01/70 00:00 | ||
WHY ON EARTH DO SO?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |