Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/16/06 22:28
Read: times


 		 #126547 - 100% is not always 100%
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil said:
The software will always use 100.0% of the CPU - unless the CPU is put into some sort of sleep mode (even then, you could argue that the CPU availability is reduced, so its usage is still 100%...)

Now I think that this is an overstatement. IMHO Yu Zhang wants to measure the time his software does something useful... E.g. not loops waiting for input or for timer tick.

Andy Neil said:
You need to clearly define what it is that you're actually trying to achieve here...!


... as usually...

JW



List of 43 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
How to calculate CPU usage?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Generally            01/01/70 00:00      
      multicore '52?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Keil Tools            01/01/70 00:00      
   With what tools ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Always 100.0%            01/01/70 00:00      
      Or            01/01/70 00:00      
         LED?            01/01/70 00:00      
            A way, Not the Way            01/01/70 00:00      
               spelling and syntax, just as an aside            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Thanks guys.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     What would that tell you?!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        100% is not always 100%            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Idle Not Idle            01/01/70 00:00      
                              We can not see your code            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 60% is not arbitrary            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Run a co-operative tasker!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 he is doing the right thing, why lead him astray            01/01/70 00:00      
                              WHY            01/01/70 00:00      
                     then this is off-topic            01/01/70 00:00      
                        This isn't the Keil forum, so why ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  My spelling sucks            01/01/70 00:00      
   Be sure to measure what's important            01/01/70 00:00      
      Good point            01/01/70 00:00      
         ISRs            01/01/70 00:00      
         Protocol?            01/01/70 00:00      
            adding a word            01/01/70 00:00      
            Checksums are not spackle            01/01/70 00:00      
         Try this            01/01/70 00:00      
            clarification            01/01/70 00:00      
               Delay.            01/01/70 00:00      
               Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
            I'll try this!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Now try this!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It still qualifies as simple ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Stepping inside ISR            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Essential things ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it still applies            01/01/70 00:00      
         re; control task            01/01/70 00:00      
            an added word            01/01/70 00:00      
            Buffered UART ?            01/01/70 00:00      
               there is a reason            01/01/70 00:00      
   Done!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List