Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/16/06 20:19
Read: times


 
#128118 - what you miss ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
.. is that you are not supposed to look at the preprocessor output. I know nothing of SDCC, but in keil it would end up in assembly as
mov TH0,#nnH
mov TL0,#nnH

so, while, when you do what you are not supposed to do (look at the preprocessor output), it may look silly, the final produt is fine.

Erik

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
SDCC how to            01/01/70 00:00      
   erm dunno but            01/01/70 00:00      
   Errr            01/01/70 00:00      
   Aside: XTAL            01/01/70 00:00      
   no no            01/01/70 00:00      
      Missing the point            01/01/70 00:00      
   basic C            01/01/70 00:00      
      preprocessor does not do it!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why floating point? On an 8051?            01/01/70 00:00      
   yeah            01/01/70 00:00      
      preprocessor does not do it!            01/01/70 00:00      
   sorry but its still not working            01/01/70 00:00      
      expand and see            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not quite...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Do it by hand!            01/01/70 00:00      
         ... or let the preprocessor do it for you            01/01/70 00:00      
   to make things more clear            01/01/70 00:00      
      Show your expansion!            01/01/70 00:00      
         preprocessor output            01/01/70 00:00      
            what you miss ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               I don't understand your point, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
   finally I found            01/01/70 00:00      
      you are trying to be too good            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'd guess....            01/01/70 00:00      
   wow            01/01/70 00:00      
      I know that, but they are similar enough to ..            01/01/70 00:00      
   one more time            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List