| ??? 12/12/06 14:29 Read: times |
#129342 - Heh. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sometimes inline assembler is because assembler is required and some idiot has declared that all code must be C (seen it).
Yikes. A major cellphone company (name witheld) has the rule of "No global variables under any circumstances". So, in main() there is an enomous structure, the pointer to which is carried all over the place. Of course, this can be "improved" - by making the structure static. Of course, make the pointer static, too. Call it a "handle" to add to the confusion. Taken from the guide to writing unmaintainable code: http://thc.org/root/phun/unmaintain.html |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Help me for inline assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wait a min! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Explain! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Help me for inline assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How 'C' systems start. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to link the assembled file | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You still haven't said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil C51 and the SRC directive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Before you go there... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes inline assembler is because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Heh. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutly! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Access Stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's my line! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The only useful information on the stack ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not want, but have to | 01/01/70 00:00 |