| ??? 12/13/06 13:27 Read: times |
#129402 - That's my line! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
However Accessing the stack in '51 C is a very bad idea. I don't see how accessing the stack in '51 C is any worse than in "normal" C? In fact, since "normal" C makes far greater use of the Stack than '51 C, I would have thought that the opposite, if anything, is true?! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Help me for inline assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wait a min! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Explain! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Help me for inline assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How 'C' systems start. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to link the assembled file | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You still haven't said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil C51 and the SRC directive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Before you go there... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes inline assembler is because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Heh. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutly! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Access Stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's my line! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The only useful information on the stack ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not want, but have to | 01/01/70 00:00 |