| ??? 12/13/06 10:16 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#129392 - Why ? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You have already started a thread about this question.
http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=129377 You already got answers to the question in that thread. Why do ask the question again, here ? Did you not read your other thread ? Did you not read the answers ? Did you not like the answers and hope that by asking the question again, you get the answers you want to hear ? Accessing the stack in C is a bad idea. It will create a maintenance and debugging nightmare, right after you have gone through the dreadful process of making it "work, sort of". You'll have to take that from people who write software for a living. Describe what problem you want to solve that, in your opinion, requires accessing the stack from C, and I am certain you will get an answer on how to do it right (without accessing the stack from C). |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Help me for inline assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wait a min! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Explain! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Help me for inline assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How 'C' systems start. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to link the assembled file | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You still haven't said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil C51 and the SRC directive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Before you go there... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes inline assembler is because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Heh. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutly! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Access Stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's my line! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The only useful information on the stack ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not want, but have to | 01/01/70 00:00 |