| ??? 12/25/06 17:18 Read: times |
#130105 - use priority Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Asok Sankar Rudra said:
Shall I reduce the RC5 interrupt to bare minimum so as to just toggle a flag and poll that along with other switches? Or do away with RC5 interrupt completely and poll it instead? But total time taken by RC5 will remain same and clash with zero crossing.Oh!,what a dillema! There is an easy solution, simple use the very clever priority feature of the 8051 ! Assign the lower priority for RC5 and the higher priority for all phase control. Then it acts like there is no RC5 interrupt at all. Peter P.S.: I prefer polling RC5 within a timer interrupt. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Multiple Interrupts with Infrared RC5 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Must be the technique you are using | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Test Zero Cross | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Couple of questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do you disable interrputs when you are in ISR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use priority | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Peter,Please clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RC5 within interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RC5 polling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Quality workmanship... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| workmanship | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dimmers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Russel Please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some more points | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dimmers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that does not make sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Divide and Rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
instead of using your first choice, you state: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C sample code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let me assimilate your code first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| .LST? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| About the 4n35 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Jerson ,I corrected the picture | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| F629FAN Schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 |