??? 12/29/06 13:26 Read: times |
#130228 - that does not make sense Responding to: ???'s previous message |
This is a low cost application > AT89C2051 but unfortunately the built-in comparator I cannot use for zero crossing since AT89S2051 is not yet in demand in Kolkata,India and I am forced to develop on AT89S52.
do you just give up? If (as I guess) this is a high volume project, then what is the problem with, for development, paying $50 for having 10 chips flown in? For production, what is $50 when split between 10.000 chips? I have seen, I do not know how often, the concern about development costs sabotaging a whole project. Yes, for one offs development costs mean something, but for a thing like this, 'saving' on development is COSTLY. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Multiple Interrupts with Infrared RC5 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Must be the technique you are using | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Test Zero Cross | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Couple of questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do you disable interrputs when you are in ISR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use priority | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Peter,Please clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RC5 within interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RC5 polling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Quality workmanship... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
workmanship | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dimmers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Russel Please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some more points | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dimmers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that does not make sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Divide and Rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
instead of using your first choice, you state:![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C sample code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Let me assimilate your code first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
.LST? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
About the 4n35 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Jerson ,I corrected the picture | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
F629FAN Schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 |